CigarBanter

Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12

Author Topic: 1/31/2017  (Read 20558 times)

razgueado

  • Founding Member
  • Esteemed Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 18725
  • KG7OCA
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #150 on: January 31, 2017, 06:03:35 PM »

I think I will pick up my toys and go home but got to make a 15 minute stop on the way.

Might be something in a Lancero Vitola awaiting my arrival.  76 warm degrees out and nothing but sunshine!
MC Two lit and some cold refreshing sparkling water to sip.
Was able to smoke an EPC New Wave with water earlier today.
GFY (good kind) getting in a cigar!
Speaking of cigars, last night MacGuyver and the Bidness Partner came over and we tried out the Laranja Reserva Toro and the Room 101 HN's. Both cigars had about a week of rest in the humidor since delivery. Both excellent cigars, but the surprise was I liked the HN better. I kinda assumed from the raves here that the Laranja would be the superior cigar. But on first impressions, I preferred the HN.
Logged

Travellin Dave

  • Fanatical Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 78487
  • Have a punkin'
    • My Top Cigars of 2021
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #151 on: January 31, 2017, 06:33:48 PM »

I think I will pick up my toys and go home but got to make a 15 minute stop on the way.

Might be something in a Lancero Vitola awaiting my arrival.  76 warm degrees out and nothing but sunshine!
MC Two lit and some cold refreshing sparkling water to sip.
Was able to smoke an EPC New Wave with water earlier today.
GFY (good kind) getting in a cigar!
Speaking of cigars, last night MacGuyver and the Bidness Partner came over and we tried out the Laranja Reserva Toro and the Room 101 HN's. Both cigars had about a week of rest in the humidor since delivery. Both excellent cigars, but the surprise was I liked the HN better. I kinda assumed from the raves here that the Laranja would be the superior cigar. But on first impressions, I preferred the HN.
No argument with that.  I enjoy the HN a lot, solid and fairly uniform throughout.  The Laranja starts out OK,but comes into its own in the second half and to me has a more enjoyable flavor profile.  Bottom line, if you enjoyed either, it's  a win.   Especially with you having stocked up on the HN's.
Logged

shank

  • Junior Status
  • *
  • Posts: 394
  • Proud to be a BotL
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #152 on: January 31, 2017, 06:49:35 PM »

Probably not even a worthwhile question, as they aren't even that cheap. But has anyone tried the CI knockoffs?
Logged

A Friend of Charlie

  • Founding Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 67382
  • Proud to be a BotL
    • CigarBanter
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #153 on: January 31, 2017, 06:52:29 PM »

Probably not even a worthwhile question, as they aren't even that cheap. But has anyone tried the CI knockoffs?
Can't help ya. Try Deano.
Logged

razgueado

  • Founding Member
  • Esteemed Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 18725
  • KG7OCA
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #154 on: January 31, 2017, 06:59:18 PM »

I think I will pick up my toys and go home but got to make a 15 minute stop on the way.

Might be something in a Lancero Vitola awaiting my arrival.  76 warm degrees out and nothing but sunshine!
MC Two lit and some cold refreshing sparkling water to sip.
Was able to smoke an EPC New Wave with water earlier today.
GFY (good kind) getting in a cigar!
Speaking of cigars, last night MacGuyver and the Bidness Partner came over and we tried out the Laranja Reserva Toro and the Room 101 HN's. Both cigars had about a week of rest in the humidor since delivery. Both excellent cigars, but the surprise was I liked the HN better. I kinda assumed from the raves here that the Laranja would be the superior cigar. But on first impressions, I preferred the HN.
No argument with that.  I enjoy the HN a lot, solid and fairly uniform throughout.  The Laranja starts out OK,but comes into its own in the second half and to me has a more enjoyable flavor profile.  Bottom line, if you enjoyed either, it's  a win.   Especially with you having stocked up on the HN's.
I enjoyed both. I'll reserve final judgement until I've smoked more of both. But the HN made the better first impression.
Logged

shank

  • Junior Status
  • *
  • Posts: 394
  • Proud to be a BotL
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #155 on: January 31, 2017, 07:00:30 PM »

I think I will pick up my toys and go home but got to make a 15 minute stop on the way.

Might be something in a Lancero Vitola awaiting my arrival.  76 warm degrees out and nothing but sunshine!
MC Two lit and some cold refreshing sparkling water to sip.
Was able to smoke an EPC New Wave with water earlier today.
GFY (good kind) getting in a cigar!
Speaking of cigars, last night MacGuyver and the Bidness Partner came over and we tried out the Laranja Reserva Toro and the Room 101 HN's. Both cigars had about a week of rest in the humidor since delivery. Both excellent cigars, but the surprise was I liked the HN better. I kinda assumed from the raves here that the Laranja would be the superior cigar. But on first impressions, I preferred the HN.
No argument with that.  I enjoy the HN a lot, solid and fairly uniform throughout.  The Laranja starts out OK,but comes into its own in the second half and to me has a more enjoyable flavor profile.  Bottom line, if you enjoyed either, it's  a win.   Especially with you having stocked up on the HN's.
I enjoyed both. I'll reserve final judgement until I've smoked more of both. But the HN made the better first impression.
Intersting. I really enjoyed the Laranja. Looking forward to trying the HN!
Logged

razgueado

  • Founding Member
  • Esteemed Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 18725
  • KG7OCA
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #156 on: January 31, 2017, 07:05:24 PM »

Probably not even a worthwhile question, as they aren't even that cheap. But has anyone tried the CI knockoffs?
I have. IIRC they were the Cohiba knockoffs. They were smokable. Didn't taste like Cohibas to me, but did their own thing reasonably. I think there are better options to be had if you're willing to work at it. But for $2/stick they're tolerable.
Logged

shank

  • Junior Status
  • *
  • Posts: 394
  • Proud to be a BotL
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #157 on: January 31, 2017, 07:08:41 PM »

Probably not even a worthwhile question, as they aren't even that cheap. But has anyone tried the CI knockoffs?
I have. IIRC they were the Cohiba knockoffs. They were smokable. Didn't taste like Cohibas to me, but did their own thing reasonably. I think there are better options to be had if you're willing to work at it. But for $2/stick they're tolerable.
I was considering the Montes. Something mild-med. I think I saw them around 2 bucks in the last day or so.

Different flavor, but if we can scrounge things like Vs for 3.40 there must be  decent mild stuff to be had in the 2-3$ range, like you said, if I work at it. :)
Logged

Travellin Dave

  • Fanatical Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 78487
  • Have a punkin'
    • My Top Cigars of 2021
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #158 on: January 31, 2017, 07:08:41 PM »

Probably not even a worthwhile question, as they aren't even that cheap. But has anyone tried the CI knockoffs?
As there is good value with known sticks, I've never had a reason to try generics.
Logged

shank

  • Junior Status
  • *
  • Posts: 394
  • Proud to be a BotL
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #159 on: January 31, 2017, 07:09:12 PM »

Probably not even a worthwhile question, as they aren't even that cheap. But has anyone tried the CI knockoffs?
As there is good value with known sticks, I've never had a reason to try generics.
Ya. Makes sense.
Logged

shank

  • Junior Status
  • *
  • Posts: 394
  • Proud to be a BotL
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #160 on: January 31, 2017, 07:09:38 PM »

Is the Perdomo Champagne known to be a good one in the milder end?
Logged

razgueado

  • Founding Member
  • Esteemed Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 18725
  • KG7OCA
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #161 on: January 31, 2017, 07:31:24 PM »

Probably not even a worthwhile question, as they aren't even that cheap. But has anyone tried the CI knockoffs?
I have. IIRC they were the Cohiba knockoffs. They were smokable. Didn't taste like Cohibas to me, but did their own thing reasonably. I think there are better options to be had if you're willing to work at it. But for $2/stick they're tolerable.
I was considering the Montes. Something mild-med. I think I saw them around 2 bucks in the last day or so.

Different flavor, but if we can scrounge things like Vs for 3.40 there must be  decent mild stuff to be had in the 2-3$ range, like you said, if I work at it. :)
Exactly. Perhaps my biggest cigar order was the Omar Ortez Originals crate (60) and the Nica Rusticas crate (50). With a free shipping special and a 10% off coupon and the sale prices on the cigars, it came out to an unweighted per stick price of $2.86, IIRC.  End of November there was a deal on the Daruma Gold Roxxos for like $60 a box. But I had gotten some coupon for $50, and there was a promo code that got a discount, and I ended up getting two boxes for the price of one.  Just have to be prepared to jump on things as soon as someone here - usually Tex, Fish, or Travelin Dave - mentions something. And you have to remember what coupon codes you have. And it sometimes means you end up spending $550 in a month because you have to buy when the deals are there.  Those are the tradeoffs.
Logged

shank

  • Junior Status
  • *
  • Posts: 394
  • Proud to be a BotL
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #162 on: January 31, 2017, 07:33:35 PM »

Cool. Ya. I'll stay tuned.
Logged

A Friend of Charlie

  • Founding Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 67382
  • Proud to be a BotL
    • CigarBanter
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #163 on: January 31, 2017, 07:55:12 PM »

Is the Perdomo Champagne known to be a good one in the milder end?
Yes, Perdomo makes a quality and tasty smoke. Definitely worth a shot.
Logged

shank

  • Junior Status
  • *
  • Posts: 394
  • Proud to be a BotL
Re: 1/31/2017
« Reply #164 on: January 31, 2017, 08:05:54 PM »

Nice. AB post embargo on the stoop. Not bad. Not awesome. Just ok.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12