I'm confused. I'm not against handguns but I don't know much about them. seems to me though, that a 40mm pistol would be pretty cumbersome. I remember something in WW2 called a 20mm cannon they used on some aircraft. if cannon shells come in 20 mm, then we have 40mm handguns? should the 40mm Mark mentions be a .40cal vs mm? or did I just miss a gun joke?
You're right, 40 mm is incorrect. It's 0.40 inches, or 40 caliber, which is closer to 10 mm. I was mixing mm and calibers. F'kn gun talk, amiright?
Thanks Bean, wasn't trying to be a gun weenie, but I haven't messed with handguns much. hunted with rifles and shotguns. figured 40mm would be pretty big, but hey, i hear they make a 50 cal handgun... i shot a BAR 30 cal once and had bruises for 2 weeks afterwards. can't imagine how you can hold and accurately shoot a 50 cal handgun. wouldn't mind trying once though.
The Desert Eagle 50 A/E? It's .50 cal all right, but obviously not the rifle (or machine gun) load. It's a well designed gun, well balanced, heavy, but not punishing to shoot. The weight and the design of the action absorb a lot of the recoil. I'd love to own one, just too many guns ahead of it on my priority list. I don't frequently need to stop car bombers wearing body armor.