Let's talk about nationalism. The term seems to have developed a severely negative connotation. As a guy who is fascinated by words and by the usage of words, this interests me. By definition, "nationalism" and "patriotism" broadly overlap. But it would seem that most people have a negative view of "nationalism" and a positive view of "patriotism."
Do you think nationalism is a negative thing? Where do you believe the line is between nationalism and patriotism? Why?
I was a little confused at first because I didn't associate a negative connotation with the word NATIONALISM. Now I see what you were asking. No, I don't see this as a negative thing, but I can understand how it can be used in a divisive way, and I'm not happy about that.
Linking the word with something else, as TD indicated, can automatically put it into controversial territory - i.e. "White Nationalism" or "Christian Nationalism." But I'm more interested here in the word itself, which frequently enough is put into a negative light without linking it to other things.
I consider myself a realist, especially about international affairs, so like TD I cannot be considered an isolationist. But I expect y'all might find my views on America's role in foreign affairs rather...intense, perhaps? Maybe even "ultranationalist?" 
But we're not going there. This is just about concepts. I'm curious whether y'all consider yourselves more nationalist, more internationalist, or somehow both.
I can't help but worry that by answering your question, you and the handful of others on here, are going to receive the confirmation of how much of an idiot I am. Essentially, I love this country and I'm proud to be from the U.S.A. However, I also recognize that being a world leader entails a significant amount of responsibility, and we must collaborate with other nations to be effective world citizens. I guess we could begin manufacturing everything we need domestically and not trade with any other nations. I don't think it's realistic. I understand that as a nation, we shouldn't do things that benefit others but harm us. My priority is the U.S.A. But I am in favor of rising tides that raise all ships, versus I'm gonna take care of #1, and fuck everyone else. Based on that, I'll let you put a label on me.
It's really not about labeling, and even if it were, this is an inquiry - genuine curiosity on my part. So even if you were to say "I'm 100% internationalist, and think both borders and notions of national identity should be done away with," I'm not going to tell you you're wrong.
As it is, what I'm hearing from you and TD is that you DO consider yourselves nationalist to a significant degree, and don't think that's a bad thing to be so long as things like race or religion are not enjoined to it.
There ARE a lot of people in the world, and in this country, who think nationalism of any sort is bad. Nationalism is inherently anathema to any authentic Marxist.
This brings us to an interesting question. To what degree does your personal calculus of individualism vs collectivism influence your calculus of nationalism vs internationalism?
