CigarBanter
Cigar Banter => Daily Cigar Deals Discussion => Topic started by: CigarBanter on July 30, 2020, 02:24:00 AM
-
What's up cigar enthusiasts?! Any cigar deals on the various internet sites that are worth talking about? Join in this discussion and perhaps learn something along the way. Warning: don't proceed if you have thin skin but don't be afraid to post either... And welcome aboard!
-
Good morning. Hey Mr. Mayor. Yankees continue their dominance over Baltimore.
-
Morning, all. Happy Little Friday.
-
Good morning, Rick and Dave.
-
Good morning. Hey Mr. Mayor. Yankees continue their dominance over Baltimore.
My boys had a game of their own so I was forced to follow on my phone. I only saw the score updates.
-
Good morning. Hey Mr. Mayor. Yankees continue their dominance over Baltimore.
My boys had a game of their own so I was forced to follow on my phone. I only saw the score updates.
But I was happy with the final result.
-
Good morning. Hey Mr. Mayor. Yankees continue their dominance over Baltimore.
My boys had a game of their own so I was forced to follow on my phone. I only saw the score updates.
But I was happy with the final result.
It's nice to have some form of normalcy.
-
Good morning. Hey Mr. Mayor. Yankees continue their dominance over Baltimore.
My boys had a game of their own so I was forced to follow on my phone. I only saw the score updates.
But I was happy with the final result.
It's nice to have some form of normalcy.
And NFL training camps have opened up. Let's see how long they can keep them open.
-
Morning Rick, Dave and Tony.
-
good morning Tony, Rick, and Dave.
-
Looks like Jam was so good, we'll carry on for a second day!
-
Morning FloriDean.
-
12 minutes and counting until our next mission to Mars lifts off:
https://www.nasa.gov/nasalive
-
Good morning. Hey Mr. Mayor. Yankees continue their dominance over Baltimore.
-
good morning Tony, Rick, and Dave.
... and Dave.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
On July 30, 1945, the Portland class heavy cruiser USS Indianapolis, having just delivered components of the atomic bomb to Tinian in the Mariana Islands, was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine; only 317 out of nearly 1,200 men survived.
On this date:
In 1619, the first representative assembly in America convened in Jamestown in the Virginia Colony.
In 1792, the French national anthem “La Marseillaise” (lah mar-seh-YEHZ’), by Claude Joseph Rouget de Lisle, was first sung in Paris by troops arriving from Marseille.
In 1844, the New York Yacht Club was founded.
In 1908, the first round-the-world automobile race, which had begun in New York in February, ended in Paris with the drivers of the American car, a Thomas Flyer, declared the winners over teams from Germany and Italy.
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
In 1960, the recently founded American Football League saw its first pre-season game, in which the Boston Patriots defeated the host Buffalo Bills 28-7.
In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed a measure creating Medicare, which began operating the following year.
In 1975, former Teamsters union president Jimmy Hoffa disappeared in suburban Detroit; although presumed dead, his remains have never been found.
In 1980, Israel’s Knesset passed a law reaffirming all of Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish state.
In 2001, Robert Mueller (MUHL’-ur), President George W. Bush’s choice to head the FBI, promised the Senate Judiciary Committee that if confirmed, he would move forcefully to fix problems at the agency. (Mueller became FBI director on Sept. 4, 2001, a week before the 9/11 attacks.)
In 2003, President George W. Bush took personal responsibility for the first time for using discredited intelligence in his State of the Union address, but predicted he would be vindicated for going to war against Iraq.
-
Ten years ago: President Barack Obama toured Chrysler and General Motors assembly plants, where he offered an upbeat assessment of the U.S. auto industry a year after the big government bailouts. A 12-year-old Florida girl was seriously injured when she plunged about 100 feet to the ground from an amusement park free-fall ride in Lake Delton, Wisconsin. (Nets and air bags that were supposed to catch Teagan Marti (TEE’-gehn MAHR’-tee) had not been deployed.)
Five years ago: The Associated Press released the results of a five-month independent study it had commissioned which found that athletes competing in the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro would be swimming and boating in waters so rife with sewage bacteria and viruses, they faced the risk of becoming seriously ill. The Afghan Taliban confirmed the death of longtime leader Mullah Mohammad Omar and appointed his successor, Mullah Akhtar Mansoor. Singer Lynn Anderson, 67, whose strong, husky voice carried her to the top of the charts with “(I Never Promised You a) Rose Garden,” died in Nashville, Tennessee.
One year ago: At a debate in Detroit, the “Medicare for All” proposal from the leading Democratic progressive candidates came under fire from moderates who warned that “wish list economics” would hurt the party’s chances for winning the White House in 2020. President Donald Trump marked the 400th anniversary of American democracy at an event in Jamestown, Virginia; it was boycotted by Black Virginia lawmakers angered by Trump’s continued disparagement of veteran Black congressman Elijah Cummings. Hall of Fame football middle linebacker Nick Buoniconti, who helped lead the Miami Dolphins to their unbeaten record in 1972, died at the age of 78.
-
Today’s Birthdays:
Former Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig is 86.
Blues musician Buddy Guy is 84.
Movie director Peter Bogdanovich is 81.
Feminist activist Eleanor Smeal is 81.
Former U.S. Rep. Patricia Schroeder is 80.
Singer Paul Anka is 79.
Jazz musician David Sanborn is 75.
Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is 73.
Actor William Atherton is 73.
Actor Jean Reno (zhahn rih-NOH’) is 72.
Blues singer-musician Otis Taylor is 72.
Actor Frank Stallone is 70.
Actor Ken Olin is 66.
Actress Delta Burke is 64.
Law professor Anita Hill is 64.
Singer-songwriter Kate Bush is 62.
Country singer Neal McCoy is 62.
Actor Richard Burgi is 62.
Movie director Richard Linklater is 60.
Actor Laurence Fishburne is 59.
Actress Lisa Kudrow is 57.
Bluegrass musician Danny Roberts (The Grascals) is 57.
Country musician Dwayne O’Brien is 57.
Actress Vivica A. Fox is 56.
Actor Terry Crews is 52.
Actor Simon Baker is 51.
Actor Donnie Keshawarz is 51.
Movie director Christopher Nolan is 50.
Actor Tom Green is 49.
Rock musician Brad Hargreaves (Third Eye Blind) is 49.
Actress Christine Taylor is 49.
Actor-comedian Dean Edwards is 47.
Actress Hilary Swank is 46.
Olympic gold medal beach volleyball player Misty May-Treanor is 43.
Actress Jaime Pressly is 43.
Alt-country singer-musician Seth Avett (AY’-veht) is 40.
Actress April Bowlby is 40.
Soccer player Hope Solo is 39.
Actress Yvonne Strahovski is 38.
Actor Martin Starr is 38.
Actress Gina Rodriguez is 36.
Actor Nico Tortorella is 32.
Actress Joey King is 21.
-
Cartoon of the Day
-
Glad Tony flipped the Today in History page today.
-
This Texas Congressman thinks having to wear a mask GAVE him 'Rona....
...and this is what is leading the country....
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/louie-gohmert-wonders-if-he-got-covid-19-from-his-face-mask/ar-BB17mGlJ?ocid=anaheim-ntp-feeds
-
Good morning, FloridaDean and ClemsonDave.
-
This Texas Congressman thinks having to wear a mask GAVE him 'Rona....
...and this is what is leading the country....
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/louie-gohmert-wonders-if-he-got-covid-19-from-his-face-mask/ar-BB17mGlJ?ocid=anaheim-ntp-feeds
Maybe he was wearing someone else's mask?
-
Glad Tony flipped the Today in History page today.
Me too.
-
This Texas Congressman thinks having to wear a mask GAVE him 'Rona....
...and this is what is leading the country....
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/louie-gohmert-wonders-if-he-got-covid-19-from-his-face-mask/ar-BB17mGlJ?ocid=anaheim-ntp-feeds
This all makes sense to me.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1960, the recently founded American Football League saw its first pre-season game, in which the Boston Patriots defeated the host Buffalo Bills 28-7...
Some things never change.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
-
emptied and cleaned hottub. La Palina Classis as it fills.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
Plus, even if they wanted to leave right now, they can't, because there's nowhere we can go. ;)
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
Plus, even if they wanted to leave right now, they can't, because there's nowhere we can go. ;)
In fact, I have a friend from high school that lives in Ireland, and even though she's been there for years, she can't go anywhere else in Europe, because she's still technically an American.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
Plus, even if they wanted to leave right now, they can't, because there's nowhere we can go. ;)
I feel unwanted and unappreciated!
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
Plus, even if they wanted to leave right now, they can't, because there's nowhere we can go. ;)
I feel unwanted and unappreciated!
so long as you update us on the news and Bean's rappers you'll always have a place here. 🤣
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
Plus, even if they wanted to leave right now, they can't, because there's nowhere we can go. ;)
I feel unwanted and unappreciated!
so long as you update us on the news and Bean's rappers you'll always have a place here. 🤣
CNS
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
Plus, even if they wanted to leave right now, they can't, because there's nowhere we can go. ;)
I feel unwanted and unappreciated!
They just want to avoid us like the plague, which has taken on a whole new meaning this year. :D
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
Plus, even if they wanted to leave right now, they can't, because there's nowhere we can go. ;)
I feel unwanted and unappreciated!
so long as you update us on the news and Bean's rappers you'll always have a place here.
Amén.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
Plus, even if they wanted to leave right now, they can't, because there's nowhere we can go. ;)
In fact, I have a friend from high school that lives in Ireland, and even though she's been there for years, she can't go anywhere else in Europe, because she's still technically an American.
Ireland or Northern Ireland?
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
people came to this country to escape religious prosecution only to learn one nation under God. although I don't see many leaving this country for a better place to live elsewhere. not much you can't do in this country compared to others. even though freedom isn't free, there's a few generations who know not what that means.
Plus, even if they wanted to leave right now, they can't, because there's nowhere we can go. ;)
In fact, I have a friend from high school that lives in Ireland, and even though she's been there for years, she can't go anywhere else in Europe, because she's still technically an American.
Ireland or Northern Ireland?
I'm like 95% sure it's Northern Ireland.
-
Gurkha's up on the Jam (it's only fitting!). Speaking of Gurkha's, CI offering a tactical cigar case and backpack with the featured Gurkha purchase.
-
Herman Cain has died due to #FakeRona.
-
Perusing the CI new cigar listings....
La Palina Regal Reserve Connecticut
Man O' War Dark Aged Maduro
La Palina Regal Reserve Oscuro
Camacho Liberty Series 2020 6 x 60 box pressed...I remember when they all used to be 11/18s....
RoMa Craft Baka (Cameroon)
-
La Palina Black and Bronze BOGO 5ers at Atlantic this week.
-
CI Legends by Drew Estate
10 Toro / $39.99
-
Bunch of new Fratello's as well it seems; Camo Blu Maduro, Camo Rosso Habano and Camo Verde Connecticut.
-
With a little bit of black Sharpie, these labels could be interesting.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be contradicted or violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
-
EPC now making a cigar for Villager. Who hasn't he worked with now?
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
-
Morning, muchachos.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be contradicted or violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
I loves me a good edumaction. A lot of things happened in 1814, that doesn't make them correct. So now, GFY.
Also, you should know that I was kneeling while reading your post.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be contradicted or violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
I loves me a good edumaction. A lot of things happened in 1814, that doesn't make them correct. So now, GFY.
Also, you should know that I was kneeling while reading your post.
Why is that? The boss lady giving you the once over?
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
But did it not physically replace it on currency?
-
CI Legends by Drew Estate
10 Toro / $39.99
Oliva 10er Sampler
10 asst./37.50
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be contradicted or violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
I loves me a good edumaction. A lot of things happened in 1814, that doesn't make them correct. So now, GFY.
Also, you should know that I was kneeling while reading your post.
Why? Were you nauseated or something?
No, being historical doesn't make things correct. But when the SCOTUS says something is constitutional, it is.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be contradicted or violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
I loves me a good edumaction. A lot of things happened in 1814, that doesn't make them correct. So now, GFY.
Also, you should know that I was kneeling while reading your post.
Why? Were you nauseated or something?
No, being historical doesn't make things correct. But when the SCOTUS says something is constitutional, it is.
Unless Trumpf disagrees... ;)
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
But did it not physically replace it on currency?
No. Both appear on currency. Except when the Mint screws up and omits both, triggering hysteria among religious people.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be contradicted or violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
I loves me a good edumaction. A lot of things happened in 1814, that doesn't make them correct. So now, GFY.
Also, you should know that I was kneeling while reading your post.
Why? Were you nauseated or something?
No, being historical doesn't make things correct. But when the SCOTUS says something is constitutional, it is.
Unless Trumpf disagrees... ;)
Or people against abortion.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
All the ones the IRS has exempted them from?
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
But did it not physically replace it on currency?
No. Both appear on currency. Except when the Mint screws up and omits both, triggering hysteria among religious people.
Just do as the NWO say. OBEY! No GOD No Wall No USA at all. Or better do as NWA Fight the Power!
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
All the ones the IRS has exempted them from?
Better to just get rid of the IRS
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be contradicted or violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
I loves me a good edumaction. A lot of things happened in 1814, that doesn't make them correct. So now, GFY.
Also, you should know that I was kneeling while reading your post.
Why? Were you nauseated or something?
No, being historical doesn't make things correct. But when the SCOTUS says something is constitutional, it is.
Unless Trumpf disagrees... ;)
Or people against abortion.
Or people who support gun control.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
All the ones the IRS has exempted them from?
Sure...and they are?
It's okay, general categories will do. I won't make you be overly specific.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
But did it not physically replace it on currency?
No. Both appear on currency. Except when the Mint screws up and omits both, triggering hysteria among religious people.
But ecstasy in Numismatics circles.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
All the ones the IRS has exempted them from?
Sure...and they are?
It's okay, general categories will do. I won't make you be overly specific.
In general - federal, state, local income and property.
By the way, LOLing at "won't make you be overly specific".
-
did someone say 'ecstasy'?
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be contradicted or violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
I loves me a good edumaction. A lot of things happened in 1814, that doesn't make them correct. So now, GFY.
Also, you should know that I was kneeling while reading your post.
Why? Were you nauseated or something?
No, being historical doesn't make things correct. But when the SCOTUS says something is constitutional, it is.
Unless Trumpf disagrees... ;)
Or people against abortion.
Or people who support gun control.
"When in the course of human events, people REALLY don't want standard background checks..." ;)
-
did someone say 'ecstasy'?
A fine way to change topics.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
All the ones the IRS has exempted them from?
Sure...and they are?
It's okay, general categories will do. I won't make you be overly specific.
In general - federal, state, local income and property.
By the way, LOLing at "won't make you be overly specific".
In general, Federal is a categorical distinguisher, not a type of tax. Types of federal tax would include "income taxes," "property taxes," "payroll taxes," "capital gains taxes," "estate taxes," and a few other lesser-known and infrequently used types. There is no federal sales tax, nor property tax.
The only federal tax that Churches are exempt from is income tax, and the exemption doesn't cover income unrelated to direct church ministry. Basically, what goes in the offering plate or gets provided to the church via a fundraiser is exempt from federal tax. Income from unrelated business is not exempt. Churches are not exempt from any other type of federal taxes, with the exception that official clergy meeting some specific criteria get to skip some of the payroll taxes (Social Security), but they also don't get the benefit of those either. So that's a wash.
In this regard, churches are no different than any other charitable organization, or any other non-profit entity. So...if you're going to tax churches, then you also have to tax the NAACP, the United Way, March of Dimes, MDA, yadda, yadda, yadda. And the reason that we don't tax those entities is twofold - they provide a service to the community, and there isn't a lot of income left over to tax. It'll cost more to impose and collect the taxes than will be gained.
State property tax exemptions only go so far as well, and if you don't think those taxes are fair then you're just not a progressive. Imposing property taxes on churches fails to recognize that they are non-profit organizations. So it is a frequent case that the property the church sits on is more valuable than the income-producing capability of the organization (remember, churches can only produce income so many ways before running into Unrelated Business taxation). So property taxes on churches would inherently be regressive in nature.
So...what great national windfall are you expecting to collect by taxing charitable non-profits?
-
@Mr. Bean....Don't know if you saw my post last night, but welcome to the ACC! Not only are we going to play our regularly scheduled game, many are projecting a rematch in the ACC championship game. We may get to play twice!!! ;D
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be contradicted or violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
I loves me a good edumaction. A lot of things happened in 1814, that doesn't make them correct. So now, GFY.
Also, you should know that I was kneeling while reading your post.
Why? Were you nauseated or something?
No, being historical doesn't make things correct. But when the SCOTUS says something is constitutional, it is.
Unless Trumpf disagrees... ;)
Or people against abortion.
Or people who support gun control.
"When in the course of human events, people REALLY don't want standard background checks..." ;)
Well, if terminating a human heartbeat is a constitutionally protected private decision of a mother, then what kind of gun and how many I buy is nunya as well.
-
Speaking of which, I have my eye on a Springfield 1911 Ronin...
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
All the ones the IRS has exempted them from?
Sure...and they are?
It's okay, general categories will do. I won't make you be overly specific.
In general - federal, state, local income and property.
By the way, LOLing at "won't make you be overly specific".
In general, Federal is a categorical distinguisher, not a type of tax. Types of federal tax would include "income taxes," "property taxes," "payroll taxes," "capital gains taxes," "estate taxes," and a few other lesser-known and infrequently used types. There is no federal sales tax, nor property tax.
The only federal tax that Churches are exempt from is income tax, and the exemption doesn't cover income unrelated to direct church ministry. Basically, what goes in the offering plate or gets provided to the church via a fundraiser is exempt from federal tax. Income from unrelated business is not exempt. Churches are not exempt from any other type of federal taxes, with the exception that official clergy meeting some specific criteria get to skip some of the payroll taxes (Social Security), but they also don't get the benefit of those either. So that's a wash.
In this regard, churches are no different than any other charitable organization, or any other non-profit entity. So...if you're going to tax churches, then you also have to tax the NAACP, the United Way, March of Dimes, MDA, yadda, yadda, yadda. And the reason that we don't tax those entities is twofold - they provide a service to the community, and there isn't a lot of income left over to tax. It'll cost more to impose and collect the taxes than will be gained.
State property tax exemptions only go so far as well, and if you don't think those taxes are fair then you're just not a progressive. Imposing property taxes on churches fails to recognize that they are non-profit organizations. So it is a frequent case that the property the church sits on is more valuable than the income-producing capability of the organization (remember, churches can only produce income so many ways before running into Unrelated Business taxation). So property taxes on churches would inherently be regressive in nature.
So...what great national windfall are you expecting to collect by taxing charitable non-profits?
Yes, federal is a categorical distinguisher. You DID ask for general categories, did you not?
And while churches provide a service to the community, I would counter that meth dealers do as well, but I wouldn't consider either of them good services.
Finally, I don't remember saying we would be solving the debt crisis or anything here. Merely that they, sports leagues like the NFL and huge corporations that take in billions a year in profit should be forced to pay taxes, like the rest of us.
-
ecstasy
-
Speaking of which, I have my eye on a Springfield 1911 Ronin...
I think using a gun to kill a fetus is double jeopardy, right? I don't know, I never saw that Tommy Lee Jones movie.
-
TAKING IT GENTLY
You are so beautiful
and desirable; creating
a raging fire in my loins.
I fight the urge to rush
and pounce on you,
but I cannot. You deserve
respect, understanding, and patience,
You are a real goddess
not some object to be pounced
on and left high and dry
as your lover satisfies his selfishness.
I listen to you, hear your
preferences and desires to
be fucked in special ways;
just hearing how you want
to share is such a turn-on.
It is not fair to either
of us to rush down the
erotic highway and not get
the TOTAL pleasure from
our journey---shall we begin
our slow and gentle journey?
-
TAKING IT GENTLY
You are so beautiful
and desirable; creating
a raging fire in my loins.
I fight the urge to rush
and pounce on you,
but I cannot. You deserve
respect, understanding, and patience,
You are a real goddess
not some object to be pounced
on and left high and dry
as your lover satisfies his selfishness.
I listen to you, hear your
preferences and desires to
be fucked in special ways;
just hearing how you want
to share is such a turn-on.
It is not fair to either
of us to rush down the
erotic highway and not get
the TOTAL pleasure from
our journey---shall we begin
our slow and gentle journey?
Tony - still want to avoid politics? :D
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
Property tax, federal income tax, state income tax, sales tax...
Please correct me.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
All the ones the IRS has exempted them from?
Sure...and they are?
It's okay, general categories will do. I won't make you be overly specific.
In general - federal, state, local income and property.
By the way, LOLing at "won't make you be overly specific".
In general, Federal is a categorical distinguisher, not a type of tax. Types of federal tax would include "income taxes," "property taxes," "payroll taxes," "capital gains taxes," "estate taxes," and a few other lesser-known and infrequently used types. There is no federal sales tax, nor property tax.
The only federal tax that Churches are exempt from is income tax, and the exemption doesn't cover income unrelated to direct church ministry. Basically, what goes in the offering plate or gets provided to the church via a fundraiser is exempt from federal tax. Income from unrelated business is not exempt. Churches are not exempt from any other type of federal taxes, with the exception that official clergy meeting some specific criteria get to skip some of the payroll taxes (Social Security), but they also don't get the benefit of those either. So that's a wash.
In this regard, churches are no different than any other charitable organization, or any other non-profit entity. So...if you're going to tax churches, then you also have to tax the NAACP, the United Way, March of Dimes, MDA, yadda, yadda, yadda. And the reason that we don't tax those entities is twofold - they provide a service to the community, and there isn't a lot of income left over to tax. It'll cost more to impose and collect the taxes than will be gained.
State property tax exemptions only go so far as well, and if you don't think those taxes are fair then you're just not a progressive. Imposing property taxes on churches fails to recognize that they are non-profit organizations. So it is a frequent case that the property the church sits on is more valuable than the income-producing capability of the organization (remember, churches can only produce income so many ways before running into Unrelated Business taxation). So property taxes on churches would inherently be regressive in nature.
So...what great national windfall are you expecting to collect by taxing charitable non-profits?
Yes, federal is a categorical distinguisher. You DID ask for general categories, did you not?
And while churches provide a service to the community, I would counter that meth dealers do as well, but I wouldn't consider either of them good services.
Finally, I don't remember saying we would be solving the debt crisis or anything here. Merely that they, sports leagues like the NFL and huge corporations that take in billions a year in profit should be forced to pay taxes, like the rest of us.
pretty sure those Meth dealers are tax exempt as well.
-
going to replace the spikes in my golf shoes and load my clubs in the truck.
bringing a Paragas Black and coffee with me, then hit the hottub.
see you all tomorrow.
-
going to replace the spikes in my golf shoes and load my clubs in the truck.
bringing a Paragas Black and coffee with me, then hit the hottub.
see you all tomorrow.
Later, Deano.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
Property tax, federal income tax, state income tax, sales tax...
Please correct me.
Careful what you wish for...
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
All the ones the IRS has exempted them from?
Sure...and they are?
It's okay, general categories will do. I won't make you be overly specific.
In general - federal, state, local income and property.
By the way, LOLing at "won't make you be overly specific".
In general, Federal is a categorical distinguisher, not a type of tax. Types of federal tax would include "income taxes," "property taxes," "payroll taxes," "capital gains taxes," "estate taxes," and a few other lesser-known and infrequently used types. There is no federal sales tax, nor property tax.
The only federal tax that Churches are exempt from is income tax, and the exemption doesn't cover income unrelated to direct church ministry. Basically, what goes in the offering plate or gets provided to the church via a fundraiser is exempt from federal tax. Income from unrelated business is not exempt. Churches are not exempt from any other type of federal taxes, with the exception that official clergy meeting some specific criteria get to skip some of the payroll taxes (Social Security), but they also don't get the benefit of those either. So that's a wash.
In this regard, churches are no different than any other charitable organization, or any other non-profit entity. So...if you're going to tax churches, then you also have to tax the NAACP, the United Way, March of Dimes, MDA, yadda, yadda, yadda. And the reason that we don't tax those entities is twofold - they provide a service to the community, and there isn't a lot of income left over to tax. It'll cost more to impose and collect the taxes than will be gained.
State property tax exemptions only go so far as well, and if you don't think those taxes are fair then you're just not a progressive. Imposing property taxes on churches fails to recognize that they are non-profit organizations. So it is a frequent case that the property the church sits on is more valuable than the income-producing capability of the organization (remember, churches can only produce income so many ways before running into Unrelated Business taxation). So property taxes on churches would inherently be regressive in nature.
So...what great national windfall are you expecting to collect by taxing charitable non-profits?
Yes, federal is a categorical distinguisher. You DID ask for general categories, did you not?
And while churches provide a service to the community, I would counter that meth dealers do as well, but I wouldn't consider either of them good services.
Finally, I don't remember saying we would be solving the debt crisis or anything here. Merely that they, sports leagues like the NFL and huge corporations that take in billions a year in profit should be forced to pay taxes, like the rest of us.
pretty sure those Meth dealers are tax exempt as well.
One problem at a time. ;)
-
As per Mr. Oy's suggestion, HVC 500 Anniv.
-
ecstasy
LSD
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
Property tax, federal income tax, state income tax, sales tax...
Please correct me.
Oh shit. I'm gonna have to go back and do some catching up. You bunch of post whores!
-
...
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
So...what great national windfall are you expecting to collect by taxing charitable non-profits?
Well that's a very different argument than, "What taxes do you think churches don't pay?" I think the point was that not all churches are truly all that charitable. A few bad apples have been discovered along the way and made me sceptical. Again, no different than other "charities".
-
As per Mr. Oy's suggestion, HVC 500 Anniv.
I'm quite curious about that one myself.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1960, the recently founded American Football League saw its first pre-season game, in which the Boston Patriots defeated the host Buffalo Bills 28-7...
Some things never change.
Hey I saw that
-
@Mr. Bean....Don't know if you saw my post last night, but welcome to the ACC! Not only are we going to play our regularly scheduled game, many are projecting a rematch in the ACC championship game. We may get to play twice!!! ;D
Indeed. Beyond TL being back at QB I haven't look into prospects for either team. What is the ACC doing about fan attendance?
-
Hazzuh, non-charitables!
-
Hazzuh, non-charitables!
Later, Dave.
-
Speaking of which, I have my eye on a Springfield 1911 Ronin...
Haven't had the chance to touch one. But Springfield does nice work. I love my Springfield Loaded.
-
going to replace the spikes in my golf shoes and load my clubs in the truck.
bringing a Paragas Black and coffee with me, then hit the hottub.
see you all tomorrow.
Later Dean.
-
@Mr. Bean....Don't know if you saw my post last night, but welcome to the ACC! Not only are we going to play our regularly scheduled game, many are projecting a rematch in the ACC championship game. We may get to play twice!!! ;D
Indeed. Beyond TL being back at QB I haven't look into prospects for either team. What is the ACC doing about fan attendance?
TBD, but TV is good.
-
As per Mr. Oy's suggestion, HVC 500 Anniv.
I'm quite curious about that one myself.
It's a solid. Dare I say Cubanesque?
-
@Mr. Bean....Don't know if you saw my post last night, but welcome to the ACC! Not only are we going to play our regularly scheduled game, many are projecting a rematch in the ACC championship game. We may get to play twice!!! ;D
Indeed. Beyond TL being back at QB I haven't look into prospects for either team. What is the ACC doing about fan attendance?
Lets start thinking about that wager.
-
CI stuck on Graycliffs it seems.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
All the ones the IRS has exempted them from?
Sure...and they are?
It's okay, general categories will do. I won't make you be overly specific.
In general - federal, state, local income and property.
By the way, LOLing at "won't make you be overly specific".
In general, Federal is a categorical distinguisher, not a type of tax. Types of federal tax would include "income taxes," "property taxes," "payroll taxes," "capital gains taxes," "estate taxes," and a few other lesser-known and infrequently used types. There is no federal sales tax, nor property tax.
The only federal tax that Churches are exempt from is income tax, and the exemption doesn't cover income unrelated to direct church ministry. Basically, what goes in the offering plate or gets provided to the church via a fundraiser is exempt from federal tax. Income from unrelated business is not exempt. Churches are not exempt from any other type of federal taxes, with the exception that official clergy meeting some specific criteria get to skip some of the payroll taxes (Social Security), but they also don't get the benefit of those either. So that's a wash.
In this regard, churches are no different than any other charitable organization, or any other non-profit entity. So...if you're going to tax churches, then you also have to tax the NAACP, the United Way, March of Dimes, MDA, yadda, yadda, yadda. And the reason that we don't tax those entities is twofold - they provide a service to the community, and there isn't a lot of income left over to tax. It'll cost more to impose and collect the taxes than will be gained.
State property tax exemptions only go so far as well, and if you don't think those taxes are fair then you're just not a progressive. Imposing property taxes on churches fails to recognize that they are non-profit organizations. So it is a frequent case that the property the church sits on is more valuable than the income-producing capability of the organization (remember, churches can only produce income so many ways before running into Unrelated Business taxation). So property taxes on churches would inherently be regressive in nature.
So...what great national windfall are you expecting to collect by taxing charitable non-profits?
Yes, federal is a categorical distinguisher. You DID ask for general categories, did you not?
And while churches provide a service to the community, I would counter that meth dealers do as well, but I wouldn't consider either of them good services.
Finally, I don't remember saying we would be solving the debt crisis or anything here. Merely that they, sports leagues like the NFL and huge corporations that take in billions a year in profit should be forced to pay taxes, like the rest of us.
It's an inarguable fact that the NFL and huge corporations DO pay taxes, and I know you're too intelligent to try and make a serious case they don't. So the NFL and corporations are a separate discussion, because the only rational position you could assert is that they aren't paying enough.
Regardless of your personal feelings about whether non-profits provide good services, the fact is we don't tax (most of) the income or property of non-profits for the simple reason that they do not exist to enrich anyone, and cannot enrich anyone. The reason they exist, and the reason they continue to exist, is that they provide services, to enough people (who do not share your personal sentiments) to stay afloat. And because of that we don't burden the organizations. Any non-profit who doesn't provide services valued by enough people will not be able to stay afloat, and will go away, because they can't exist on tax exemption alone. So your personal feelings don't really factor into the equation. We let charitable organizations do their thing and we leave them alone.
-
Today is Thursday, July 30, the 212th day of 2020. There are 154 days left in the year.
Today’s Highlight in History:
...
In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a measure making “In God We Trust” the national motto, replacing “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of many, one).
Very interesting. I'd vote to change it back.
Amen to that.
In that case, I take it back. . No but seriously, I'm God fearing and all but I feel like this contradicts separation of church and state.
LALTS, you think?
"Separation of Church and State" is a descriptor of a legal concept, not a law that can be violated. What you mean to suggest, perhaps, is that it "violates the establishment clause." But the Supreme Court has long held that it doesn't, which is to say, the SCOTUS says you're both wrong. Not that I particularly care, mind you.
Also, while it didn't become the national motto until 1956, it first started appearing on the money in 1864, and originates, of course, in the fourth verse of the national anthem, ca 1814.
Mr. Raz bursts forth as a font of historical info.
Good morning sir!
I just get annoyed when people make pat pronouncements about things when they haven't looked at the history or legal precedent or whatever. My fellow Christians have historically been really bad about doing this, but progressive Democrats have caught right up to them in the past three decades.
"In God We Trust" didn't "replace" E Pluribus Unum. That was never officially a motto of the United States.
In other words, ClemsonDave posted #FakeNews ?
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
Property tax, federal income tax, state income tax, sales tax...
Please correct me.
Generally speaking, corporations, be they for-profit or non-profit, aren't taxed on income at the Federal level. That particular screwing is only applied to us suckers who work for a paycheck. Corporations are taxed on profit - essentially, revenue minus expenses. There are some complexities to it, but generally speaking, that's how it works. And since non-profits, again, generally speaking, don't have any profits, they aren't taxed.
There are some states, like my own, that impose B&O taxes on business income, but because non-profits don't really participate in the commercial commons - there's no "value add" - they are mostly exempted.
Sales tax? There's no federal sales tax. And no categorical exemption of which I'm aware in any state from state and local sales taxes. Exemptions from sales taxes are contextual - what is taxed and who has to collect varies from state to state based on what is being sold and who is selling it. So churches may be exempted from tax on some types of sales, but not most for the simple reason that most sales fall into the category of unrelated business and are therefore subject to tax.
-
...
Mine was more a philosophical wish that separation of church and state was a concept that was actually followed. I'm not naive enough to think this will ever happen.
And while we're at it, let's get churches, the NFL and Amazon to actually pay taxes.
What taxes do you think churches don't pay?
So...what great national windfall are you expecting to collect by taxing charitable non-profits?
Well that's a very different argument than, "What taxes do you think churches don't pay?" I think the point was that not all churches are truly all that charitable. A few bad apples have been discovered along the way and made me sceptical. Again, no different than other "charities".
Being a "bad apple" is a surefire way to lose tax exemption. The exemption is not a blanket exemption. If the IRS finds a non-profit breaking the rules, even inadvertently, taxes are assessed, and payable. Period.
And there are some real complexities. For example, my church leases some square footage of our parking lot to a company that operates a drive-through coffee stand on it. If we didn't have a mortgage on the property, oddly enough, we could exempt that space from property taxes. But because we have a mortgage, we have to pay property taxes on it. And because renting some of our parking lot to a for-profit company is "unrelated business," the rent income is not exempted from taxes. Regardless of the fact that the church doesn't turn a profit overall, that particular effort is always considered "profitable," so we have to pay taxes on it.
-
Interesting addition to the man cave rotation from a certain NJ expat in SC
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200730/2442334783fd443044b2a6da1dd1690c.jpg)
-
Oliva Saison Maduro
Toro 5/$17.50
-
Interesting addition to the man cave rotation from a certain NJ expat in SC
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200730/2442334783fd443044b2a6da1dd1690c.jpg)
;D
-
Travelling to NJ tomorrow and will be semi incommunicado for a while after.
-
Interesting addition to the man cave rotation from a certain NJ expat in SC
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200730/2442334783fd443044b2a6da1dd1690c.jpg)
What did he call that the "nipple tip" or something?
-
Travelling to NJ tomorrow and will be semi incommunicado for a while after.
I don't know how you do it. I hope you have a safe trip.
-
Interesting addition to the man cave rotation from a certain NJ expat in SC
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200730/2442334783fd443044b2a6da1dd1690c.jpg)
That's awfully vague. There must be dozens.
-
Interesting addition to the man cave rotation from a certain NJ expat in SC
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200730/2442334783fd443044b2a6da1dd1690c.jpg)
What did he call that the "nipple tip" or something?
I think that's what Dean calls it.
-
Interesting addition to the man cave rotation from a certain NJ expat in SC
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200730/2442334783fd443044b2a6da1dd1690c.jpg)
That's awfully vague. There must be dozens.
Indeed.
-
As per Mr. Oy's suggestion, HVC 500 Anniv.
I'm quite curious about that one myself.
It's a solid. Dare I say Cubanesque?
well I don’t like them now 😂
-
Good afternoon still enjoying my hunt for the great Connecticut.
Griffins were my go to, but enjoying the Crema and have the luminosa on the way. I also enjoyed the Floe de Selva US release very much, so let me know if you see a deal.
-
Peppers 🌶 are looking good!
-
Good afternoon still enjoying my hunt for the great Connecticut.
Griffins were my go to, but enjoying the Crema and have the luminosa on the way. I also enjoyed the Floe de Selva US release very much, so let me know if you see a deal.
Have you seen my Connecticut selections under calendar events on this page? Some good ones in there
Just ones opinion. The best Connecticut is the one you like.
-
Good afternoon still enjoying my hunt for the great Connecticut.
Griffins were my go to, but enjoying the Crema and have the luminosa on the way. I also enjoyed the Floe de Selva US release very much, so let me know if you see a deal.
Have you seen my Connecticut selections under calendar events on this page? Some good ones in there
Just ones opinion. The best Connecticut is the one you like.
true. Enjoyed them then thought they were paper bags now I crave them in my rotation.
-
Interesting addition to the man cave rotation from a certain NJ expat in SC
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200730/2442334783fd443044b2a6da1dd1690c.jpg)
What did he call that the "nipple tip" or something?
I think that's what Dean calls it.
No, Dean just likes it when the word nipple is used.
-
Travelling to NJ tomorrow and will be semi incommunicado for a while after.
I don't know how you do it. I hope you have a safe trip.
Dont know, I just do it.
-
Interesting addition to the man cave rotation from a certain NJ expat in SC
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200730/2442334783fd443044b2a6da1dd1690c.jpg)
What did he call that the "nipple tip" or something?
I think that's what Dean calls it.
No, Dean just likes it when the word nipple is used.
Who doesn't?
-
Yanks are in a rain delay.
-
Yanks are in a rain delay.
Complete game though if they don't resume.
Thanks to Luke!
-
Yanks are in a rain delay.
Complete game though if they don't resume.
Thanks to Luke!
I was thinking the same.
-
Yanks are in a rain delay.
Complete game though if they don't resume.
Thanks to Luke!
I was thinking the same.
Well that was a fun one.