CigarBanter

Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic: 7/9/2019  (Read 5738 times)

FloridaDean

  • Fondling Member
  • Revered Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 25338
  • oh well.....
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #45 on: July 09, 2019, 09:56:01 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning. 😂
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
Your sagination limit of 5 inches is telling, though.  It's good to know you'll still find the ladies sufficiently attractive as you enter the Dean phase of your life.
Logged

FloridaDean

  • Fondling Member
  • Revered Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 25338
  • oh well.....
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #46 on: July 09, 2019, 09:58:41 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning. 😂
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
Your sagination limit of 5 inches is telling, though.  It's good to know you'll still find the ladies sufficiently attractive as you enter the Dean phase of your life.
Logged

A Friend of Charlie

  • Founding Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 58852
  • Proud to be a BotL
    • CigarBanter
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #47 on: July 09, 2019, 10:10:56 AM »

Today Is: National No Bra Day

National No Bra Day is being observed today! It has always been observed annually on July 9th.

No Bra Day is an annual observance on October 13 on which women are encouraged to forgo wearing a bra as a means to encourage breast cancer awareness. No Bra Day was initially observed on July 9, 2011, but within three years it had moved to October 13, the month of National Breast Cancer Awareness Month.
Should have known better than to accept breast information from a source other than Deano.
And today is also Banter GFY’s Day, if you want to claim you know something then get your fuk’n lazy asses out of bed and post first.

Meanwhile my trusted source says Today was originally NO Bra Day so thus it shall always be Today. 

$Shit, Why don’t they just move Christmas to December 26 because the turkeys are cheaper.
They can cancel it all together and it would be fine by me.
Logged

A Friend of Charlie

  • Founding Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 58852
  • Proud to be a BotL
    • CigarBanter
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #48 on: July 09, 2019, 10:12:13 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning.
And me.
Logged

A Friend of Charlie

  • Founding Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 58852
  • Proud to be a BotL
    • CigarBanter
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #49 on: July 09, 2019, 10:13:26 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning.
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
I thought that's how laws got passed?
Logged

LuvTooGolf

  • Founding Member
  • Banter Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 43911
  • Believeland!
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #50 on: July 09, 2019, 10:19:57 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning.
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
I thought that's how laws got passed?
You're thinking of executive orders. If we were talking laws, there'd be a lot more lobbyist money in my pockets right now.
Logged

Threebean

  • Guest
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #51 on: July 09, 2019, 10:33:37 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning.
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
I thought that's how laws got passed?
You're thinking of executive orders. If we were talking laws, there'd be a lot more lobbyist money in my pockets right now.
Either way I'd like to apply for the position creating the 25 yr old baseline measurement. Dean can take over after that. 
Logged

LuvTooGolf

  • Founding Member
  • Banter Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 43911
  • Believeland!
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #52 on: July 09, 2019, 10:41:44 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning.
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
I thought that's how laws got passed?
You're thinking of executive orders. If we were talking laws, there'd be a lot more lobbyist money in my pockets right now.
Either way I'd like to apply for the position creating the 25 yr old baseline measurement. Dean can take over after that.
The pay is better for the latter, but the benefits are better for the former.
Logged

Threebean

  • Guest
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #53 on: July 09, 2019, 10:45:24 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning.
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
I thought that's how laws got passed?
You're thinking of executive orders. If we were talking laws, there'd be a lot more lobbyist money in my pockets right now.
Either way I'd like to apply for the position creating the 25 yr old baseline measurement. Dean can take over after that.
The pay is better for the latter, but the benefits are better for the former.
There's pay?  Awesome! 
Logged

A Friend of Charlie

  • Founding Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 58852
  • Proud to be a BotL
    • CigarBanter
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #54 on: July 09, 2019, 10:59:00 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning.
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
I thought that's how laws got passed?
You're thinking of executive orders. If we were talking laws, there'd be a lot more lobbyist money in my pockets right now.
Either way I'd like to apply for the position creating the 25 yr old baseline measurement. Dean can take over after that.
The pay is better for the latter, but the benefits are better for the former.
There's pay?  Awesome!
And all the milk you can drink.
Logged

LuvTooGolf

  • Founding Member
  • Banter Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 43911
  • Believeland!
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #55 on: July 09, 2019, 10:59:29 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning.
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
I thought that's how laws got passed?
You're thinking of executive orders. If we were talking laws, there'd be a lot more lobbyist money in my pockets right now.
Either way I'd like to apply for the position creating the 25 yr old baseline measurement. Dean can take over after that.
The pay is better for the latter, but the benefits are better for the former.
There's pay?  Awesome!
You get paid if you do the over-5 inch set. If you want to do the baseline set, there's no pay, but the benefits are tight. ;)
Logged

LuvTooGolf

  • Founding Member
  • Banter Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 43911
  • Believeland!
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #56 on: July 09, 2019, 11:00:08 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning.
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
I thought that's how laws got passed?
You're thinking of executive orders. If we were talking laws, there'd be a lot more lobbyist money in my pockets right now.
Either way I'd like to apply for the position creating the 25 yr old baseline measurement. Dean can take over after that.
The pay is better for the latter, but the benefits are better for the former.
There's pay?  Awesome!
And all the milk you can drink.
Logged

Travellin Dave

  • Fanatical Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 71420
  • Resolutions intact
    • My Top Cigars of 2021
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #57 on: July 09, 2019, 11:06:51 AM »

Science Proves That Wearing Bras Is Bad For Your Health:

https://www.lifehack.org/336735/science-proves-that-wearing-bras-bad-for-your-health
Oh sure, NOW you listen to science. :D
I've always been in favor of no bras. best thing that came out of the 70's was bra burning. 😂
No argument here.
The only argument I'll offer is there needs to be an age limit applied.
Not so much an age limit, maybe a length limit. Like, if your nipples are more than 5 inches below where they were when you were 25, then a bra is required.
5 inches?  Sheesh, I don't have any empirical evidence, but am guessing those suckers are long overripe by that point and need containment.
Hey, I'm just spitballin' ideas here, not passing laws. ;)
Your sagination limit of 5 inches is telling, though.  It's good to know you'll still find the ladies sufficiently attractive as you enter the Dean phase of your life.
There goes my appetite.
Logged

Travellin Dave

  • Fanatical Member
  • Post Whore Extraordinaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 71420
  • Resolutions intact
    • My Top Cigars of 2021
Re: 7/9/2019
« Reply #58 on: July 09, 2019, 11:08:11 AM »

Good Day Mr. Tony.
Logged

LuvTooGolf

  • Founding Member
  • Banter Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 43911
  • Believeland!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6